From: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
To: "Eric Bénard" <eric@eukrea.com>
Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [meta-networking][PATCH] ntp: fix checksum
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:47:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4687762.mJq0VPosuu@helios> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121126113853.5e09dcff@eb-e6520>
On Monday 26 November 2012 11:38:53 Eric Bénard wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 10:34:23 +0000,
>
> Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> a écrit :
> > On Monday 26 November 2012 00:13:38 Eric Bénard wrote:
> > > commit e15543f05bb2c321cd649b90de50d1a3d8cd1199 upgrade the recipe to
> > > a newer version but didn't update the checksum so fetch is failing.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard <eric@eukrea.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > meta-networking/recipes-support/ntp/ntp_4.2.6p5.bb | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/meta-networking/recipes-support/ntp/ntp_4.2.6p5.bb
> > > b/meta-networking/recipes-support/ntp/ntp_4.2.6p5.bb index
> > > f7c5b68..0fce5ce
> > > 100644
> > > --- a/meta-networking/recipes-support/ntp/ntp_4.2.6p5.bb
> > > +++ b/meta-networking/recipes-support/ntp/ntp_4.2.6p5.bb
> > > @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ SRC_URI =
> > > "http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~ntp/ntp_spool/ntp4/ntp-4.2/ntp-${PV}.tar.g
> > > file://ntpdate \
> > >
> > > "
> > >
> > > -SRC_URI[md5sum] = "59876a9009b098ff59767ee45a88ebd2"
> > > -SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > > "6e84d4ddfa14b911c3ed88463af10867e1fa9b287e7b34d8a02e78be85a7c40e"
> > > +SRC_URI[md5sum] = "00df80a84ec9528fcfb09498075525bc"
> > > +SRC_URI[sha256sum] =
> > > "d6ab8371f9d31e594eb6922823d5ccd03dcc4e9d84b0e23ea25ac1405432f91c"
> > >
> > > EXTRA_OECONF += " --with-net-snmp-config=no --without-ntpsnmpd"
> >
> > Hmm, you're right - it did get missed. Strangely though if I do -c
> > cleanall
> > ntp then build ntp again I don't get an error with the wrong checksum
> > (with
> > danny) :/
>
> I also met this kind of behaviour but didn't look in depth at it : it
> seems that once a package is fetched, further builds won't trigger
> an error if the checksum in the recipe is wrong.
The checksum is not verified if the .done file exists on the assumption that the
fetch completed successfully and has already been verified; however when I did
-c cleanall I checked - there was no .done file, so this is unexpected
behaviour.
Cheers,
Paul
--
Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-26 11:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-25 23:13 [meta-networking][PATCH] ntp: fix checksum Eric Bénard
2012-11-26 10:34 ` Paul Eggleton
2012-11-26 10:38 ` Eric Bénard
2012-11-26 10:47 ` Paul Eggleton [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-11-27 16:19 Eric Bénard
2012-11-27 19:40 ` Joe MacDonald
2012-12-01 16:14 Peter A. Bigot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4687762.mJq0VPosuu@helios \
--to=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eric@eukrea.com \
--cc=openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.