All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: NFSv4 ML <nfsv4@linux-nfs.org>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: "Le Rouzic" <aime.le-rouzic@bull.net>,
	bon <aurelien.charbon@ext.bull.net>,
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Char?=@sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Status of NFS over IPv6
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 12:23:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4689266A.1000607@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4688E296.2040101@bull.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2294 bytes --]

Le Rouzic wrote:
>>> While there is some interest in IPv6 among some of Linux's corporate 
>>> sponsors, there really isn't an overwhelming "killer" requirement for 
>>> IPv6, so there isn't much motivation to get all this completed.  I 
>>> have to admit I'm pretty burned out on all this because of how 
>>> complicated it has all become.  I'd be happy if someone stepped 
>>> forward and volunteered to help or take over the integration.
>>>   
> Some basic tests have been also done on the submitted Aurélien's patchs
> and we will be running the robustness tests we are regularly doing for 
> ipv4.
> See also at http://nfsv4.bullopensource.org/doc/rpc_testsuite.php
> for this list of tests (cthon04, ffsb, fsx...)
> 
>>
>> We hope the interest of community about IPv6 will grow.
>> Feel free to send comments on the code.
>>  
>>
> Some customers are already asking it but  were waiting of its availibity.
> There are also products based on NFSV4 features which are interested in.

Yeah, it's kind of unfortunate that we can't be completely specific 
about the requests/requirements/use cases.  But here's what I know:

1.  Apparently there is a bureaucratic (ie non-technical) requirement 
from the US Federal government for IPv6 support in new computer software 
deployments.  I forget when this requirement kicks in, or what exactly 
"IPv6 support" really entails.

2.  The APAC market wants IPv6 because of an explosion of individual IP 
network accessors, although arguably that can be addressed for a little 
while with judicious application of NAT routers.

Otherwise, the companies I've worked for recently have had no real 
customer requests for IPv6 support in NFS.

NFS community resources are focused largely on NFSv4.1 and pNFS design 
and implementation.  However, here's some of what I think we need to get 
IPv6 done:

+  A coherent design for handling IPv6 address caching and export rules 
on the server side

+  Help from the netdev folks with reviewing our proposed IPv6 changes

+  A cunning plan to stage the integration of all the various pieces

+  Beta testers (ie real environments that can deploy NFS over IPv6 in 
real conditions)

+  A whiff of project planning to help us know what the real deadlines are

[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 315 bytes --]

begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
email;internet:chuck dot lever at nospam oracle dot com
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard


[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 286 bytes --]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/

[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-02 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-29 12:37 Status of NFS over IPv6 Steinar H. Gunderson
2007-06-29 22:01 ` Chuck Lever
2007-06-29 22:27   ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2007-07-02  9:36   ` Aurélien Charbon
2007-07-02 11:33     ` [NFS] " Le Rouzic
2007-07-02 16:23       ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2007-07-23 12:26         ` Le Rouzic
2007-07-26  7:43           ` Prasad P

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4689266A.1000607@oracle.com \
    --to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc==?ISO-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien_Char?=@sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=aime.le-rouzic@bull.net \
    --cc=aurelien.charbon@ext.bull.net \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.