From: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.osdl.org>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 18:06:52 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <468E4C7C.3050008@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1183727690.7054.104.camel@twins>
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:14 +0400, Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>
>> Separate limits for RSS and RSS+pagecache are also a must.
>
> This I still disagree upon. Page-cache limits are orthogonal to
> containers and not a requirement for containers. If you want such a
> feature get it in Linux proper and don't sneak it in the backdoor via
> containers.
What I wanted to say is that *iff* we need limit for booth the RSS and
the page cache, then we do need a separate limit for the RSS only. I do
not vote for the page cache limit either, but I do not vote _against_ it
as well, and agree to take part in its development.
Thanks,
Pavel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-06 14:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-04 22:21 [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:21 ` [-mm PATCH 1/7] Memory controller resource counters Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:21 ` [-mm PATCH 2/7] Memory controller containers setup Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:21 ` [-mm PATCH 3/7] Memory controller accounting setup Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:22 ` [-mm PATCH 4/7] Memory controller memory accounting Balbir Singh
2007-07-05 18:46 ` Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
2007-07-05 20:03 ` Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:22 ` [-mm PATCH 5/7] Memory controller task migration Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:22 ` [-mm PATCH 6/7] Memory controller add per container LRU and reclaim Balbir Singh
2007-07-04 22:22 ` [-mm PATCH 7/7] Memory controller OOM handling Balbir Singh
2007-07-05 9:14 ` [-mm PATCH 0/7] Memory controller introduction Pavel Emelianov
2007-07-05 14:32 ` Balbir Singh
2007-07-06 13:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-07-06 14:06 ` Pavel Emelianov [this message]
2007-07-06 15:34 ` Balbir Singh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-04 22:12 Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=468E4C7C.3050008@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dev@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.