From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Derek M Jones Subject: Re: [patch 5/9] x86_64: arch_pick_mmap_layout() fixlet Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2007 19:40:04 +0100 Message-ID: <468E8C84.1020508@knosof.co.uk> References: <200707060939.l669drk2019988@imap1.linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.49]:25563 "EHLO mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758033AbXGFSkJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Jul 2007 14:40:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, Josh Triplett , Al Viro , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org, adobriyan@sw.ru, ak@suse.de Linus, > Returning a void-valued expression in a void-valued function is > proper C99 (and gcc has allowed it for longer). And it often makes for No such change was made in C99. Sentence 1785 http://c0x.coding-guidelines.com/6.8.6.4.html I don't recall seeing a proposal for this in C9X. At the last WG14 meeting the gates were opened for C1X proposals. Perhaps somebody should propose this change. As you say there is prior art in gcc. -- Derek M. Jones tel: +44 (0) 1252 520 667 Knowledge Software Ltd mailto:derek@knosof.co.uk Applications Standards Conformance Testing http://www.knosof.co.uk