All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
	Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Chia-I Wu <olvaffe@gmail.com>,
	Karunika Choo <karunika.choo@arm.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/panthor: Extend IRQ helpers for mask modification/restoration
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2025 15:23:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <468eb6a1-2c9e-4835-b3fd-e8c497ddd049@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251221-panthor-tracepoints-v5-1-889ef78165d8@collabora.com>

On 21/12/2025 17:10, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> The current IRQ helpers do not guarantee mutual exclusion that covers
> the entire transaction from accessing the mask member and modifying the
> mask register.
> 
> This makes it hard, if not impossible, to implement mask modification
> helpers that may change one of these outside the normal
> suspend/resume/isr code paths.
> 
> Add a spinlock to struct panthor_irq that protects both the mask member
> and register. Acquire it in all code paths that access these. Then, add
> the aforementioned new helpers: mask_enable, mask_disable, and
> resume_restore. The first two work by ORing and NANDing the mask bits,
> and the latter relies on the new behaviour that panthor_irq::mask is not
> set to 0 on suspend.
> 
> panthor_irq::suspended remains an atomic, as it's necessarily written to
> outside the mask_lock in the suspend path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> index f35e52b9546a..eb75c83e2db3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h
> @@ -73,11 +73,14 @@ struct panthor_irq {
>  	/** @irq: IRQ number. */
>  	int irq;
>  
> -	/** @mask: Current mask being applied to xxx_INT_MASK. */
> +	/** @mask: Values to write to xxx_INT_MASK if active. */
>  	u32 mask;
>  
>  	/** @suspended: Set to true when the IRQ is suspended. */
>  	atomic_t suspended;
> +
> +	/** @mask_lock: protects modifications to _INT_MASK and @mask */
> +	spinlock_t mask_lock;
>  };
>  
>  /**
> @@ -410,6 +413,8 @@ static irqreturn_t panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_raw_handler(int irq, void *data)
>  	struct panthor_irq *pirq = data;							\
>  	struct panthor_device *ptdev = pirq->ptdev;						\
>  												\
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock);						\
> +												\
>  	if (atomic_read(&pirq->suspended))							\
>  		return IRQ_NONE;								\
>  	if (!gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_STAT))					\
> @@ -425,8 +430,10 @@ static irqreturn_t panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_threaded_handler(int irq, void *da
>  	struct panthor_device *ptdev = pirq->ptdev;						\
>  	irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;								\
>  												\
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock);						\

Woah! You can't do that. That means there's a spinlock held while
calling the __handler() function. So you'll get "sleeping while atomic"
bug reports. Specifically I can see that panthor_mmu_irq_handler() takes
a mutex.

But the whole point of a threaded handler is so that it can sleep, so we
definitely don't want a spinlock held.

Thanks,
Steve

> +												\
>  	while (true) {										\
> -		u32 status = gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_RAWSTAT) & pirq->mask;	\
> +		u32 status = (gpu_read(ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_RAWSTAT) & pirq->mask);	\
>  												\
>  		if (!status)									\
>  			break;									\
> @@ -443,18 +450,30 @@ static irqreturn_t panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_threaded_handler(int irq, void *da
>  												\
>  static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_suspend(struct panthor_irq *pirq)			\
>  {												\
> -	pirq->mask = 0;										\
> -	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, 0);					\
> +	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &pirq->mask_lock) {					\
> +		gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, 0);				\
> +	}											\
>  	synchronize_irq(pirq->irq);								\
>  	atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, true);							\
>  }												\
>  												\
>  static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume(struct panthor_irq *pirq, u32 mask)	\
>  {												\
> -	atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, false);							\
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock);						\
> +												\
>  	pirq->mask = mask;									\
> -	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_CLEAR, mask);				\
> -	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, mask);				\
> +	atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, false);							\
> +	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_CLEAR, pirq->mask);				\
> +	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask);				\
> +}												\
> +												\
> +static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume_restore(struct panthor_irq *pirq)		\
> +{												\
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock);						\
> +												\
> +	atomic_set(&pirq->suspended, false);							\
> +	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_CLEAR, pirq->mask);				\
> +	gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask);				\
>  }												\
>  												\
>  static int panthor_request_ ## __name ## _irq(struct panthor_device *ptdev,			\
> @@ -463,13 +482,33 @@ static int panthor_request_ ## __name ## _irq(struct panthor_device *ptdev,			\
>  {												\
>  	pirq->ptdev = ptdev;									\
>  	pirq->irq = irq;									\
> -	panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume(pirq, mask);						\
> +	pirq->mask = mask;									\
> +	spin_lock_init(&pirq->mask_lock);							\
> +	panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_resume_restore(pirq);					\
>  												\
>  	return devm_request_threaded_irq(ptdev->base.dev, irq,					\
>  					 panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_raw_handler,		\
>  					 panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_threaded_handler,		\
>  					 IRQF_SHARED, KBUILD_MODNAME "-" # __name,		\
>  					 pirq);							\
> +}												\
> +												\
> +static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_mask_enable(struct panthor_irq *pirq, u32 mask)	\
> +{												\
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock);						\
> +												\
> +	pirq->mask |= mask;									\
> +	if (!atomic_read(&pirq->suspended))							\
> +		gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask);			\
> +}												\
> +												\
> +static inline void panthor_ ## __name ## _irq_mask_disable(struct panthor_irq *pirq, u32 mask)	\
> +{												\
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&pirq->mask_lock);						\
> +												\
> +	pirq->mask &= ~mask;									\
> +	if (!atomic_read(&pirq->suspended))							\
> +		gpu_write(pirq->ptdev, __reg_prefix ## _INT_MASK, pirq->mask);			\
>  }
>  
>  extern struct workqueue_struct *panthor_cleanup_wq;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-22 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-21 17:10 [PATCH v5 0/3] Add a few tracepoints to panthor Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-21 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] drm/panthor: Extend IRQ helpers for mask modification/restoration Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-22 15:23   ` Steven Price [this message]
2025-12-23 15:43     ` Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-21 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/panthor: Add tracepoint for hardware utilisation changes Nicolas Frattaroli
2025-12-21 17:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] drm/panthor: Add gpu_job_irq tracepoint Nicolas Frattaroli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=468eb6a1-2c9e-4835-b3fd-e8c497ddd049@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=karunika.choo@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel@collabora.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com \
    --cc=olvaffe@gmail.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.