From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Krzysztof Helt" Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 14:48:39 +0000 Subject: [lm-sensors] TEMP_HYST and TEMP_LOW difference for 2.4 kernel? Message-Id: <468fa7c736845@wp.pl> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi, I want to add support for the THMC50 sensor to the lmsensors=20 2.x. I found that original THMC50 does not work with 2.6 kernel=20 because it expects a value tempX_max_hyst instead of tempX_min. I found that the 2.4 driver returns TEMP, TEMP_HYST and=20 TEMP_OVER. The 2.4 equivalent to the tempX_min is called=20 TEMP_LOW. Is there any difference between TEMP_LOW and TEMP_HYST?=20 May I change the 2.4 THMC50 driver (which should be cleaned and=20 extended for the adm1021 anyway) to report TEMP_LOW instead of=20 TEMP_HYST?=20 Regards, Krzysztof ---------------------------------------------------- 12 Festiwal Gwiazd z gwiazdorsk=B1 obsad=B1! 5-8 lipca w Gda=F1sku! Wi=EAcej: http://klik.wp.pl/?adr=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fadv.reklama.wp.pl%2Fas%2Ffe= stival3.html&sid=1216 _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors