From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jan Beulich" Subject: RE: VMX: emulated guest use SYSENTER MSRs Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 10:05:35 +0100 Message-ID: <4692167F.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Xin B Li Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org >>> "Li, Xin B" 07.07.07 10:57 >>> >I will send out the patch soon. Not strictly necessary - I have this as part of a larger patch already. = But if you beat me in getting this out, I'll sync up with yours. Jan >-----Original Message----- >From: Keir Fraser [mailto:Keir.Fraser@cl.cam.ac.uk]=20 >Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 4:52 PM >To: Li, Xin B; Jan Beulich; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com=20 >Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] VMX: emulated guest use SYSENTER MSRs > >Since they are included in the VMCS, and read from there on=20 >save/restore, >the vmexit appears to be unnecessary. > > -- Keir > >On 7/7/07 08:48, "Li, Xin B" wrote: > >>=20 >>> What is the reason for not simply clearing the MSR bitmap bits >>> for these three MSRs, and rather handling the reads/writes=20 >in software? >>=20 >> I haven't checked those MSRs, the original concern is we need >> save/restore them when context switch, is this needed? >>=20 >> -Xin=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Xen-devel mailing list >> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com=20 >> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel=20 >