From: Diego Ongaro <diego.ongaro@rice.edu>
To: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Interrupts to dom0
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 10:46:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4693A9BF.5070100@rice.edu> (raw)
I'd like to understand the behavior of a guest domain receiving and
answering a ping, while competing with other guest domains for the CPU.
Using xentrace, I've found that when an interrupt on the network
interface comes in, the scheduler is pretty good about waking and
scheduling the ping receiving domain next. However, once the ping
receiving domain blocks, the scheduler often allows other guest domains
to run before scheduling domain 0 again. Domain 0 is not woken and,
thus, does not get its priority boosted.
My main question is whether domain-0 operates strictly by polling,
rather than by virtual interrupts, in this scenario.
Thanks,
Diego Ongaro
Rice University
reply other threads:[~2007-07-10 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4693A9BF.5070100@rice.edu \
--to=diego.ongaro@rice.edu \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.