From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [patch 5/7] CAN: Add virtual CAN netdevice driver Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:52:58 +0200 Message-ID: <46955F4A.9060206@trash.net> References: <20070622034452.28886.0@janus.isnogud.escape.de> <20070622034703.28886.5@janus.isnogud.escape.de> <467BAC48.1070700@trash.net> <467BC2AF.8080901@trash.net> <467D0C97.1000000@hartkopp.net> <467D178B.8080503@trash.net> <467D3891.4010906@hartkopp.net> <467D4965.40601@trash.net> <467D4D65.2080806@hartkopp.net> <467D54AB.5010407@trash.net> <468BA83A.7070500@trash.net> <469243D3.3090208@trash.net> <469253CE.8040004@hartkopp.net> <46953273.2080102@hartkopp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Urs Thuermann , David Miller , j.hadi123@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Oliver Hartkopp Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:64196 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1763368AbXGKWxJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:53:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46953273.2080102@hartkopp.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Oliver Hartkopp wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > what's your opinion about my reply to your remark? > > Should we just change the module parameter from "loopback" to > "loopbacktest" to make the test intention obvious? > Or should we remove the loopback test functionality? I'll look into it tommorrow, please be patient.