From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129])
	by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id l6C3M1Lc000897
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 23:22:01 -0400
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9])
	by jazzhorn.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id l6C3M049015940
	for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 03:22:01 GMT
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k22so18291waf
        for <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 20:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46959D3B.7040202@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 11:17:15 +0800
From: Ken YANG <spng.yang@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SELinux List <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: which tool i should use for policy generation
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB18030
Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov
List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov



i find three papers about policy generation tools:

<<Guided Policy Generation for Application Authors>>
<<Madison: A New Approach to Policy Generation>>
<<Madison ¨C A New Approach to Policy Generation>>


it seems the last one is the last, so is that mean we
should use sepolgen rather than madison.

BTW, i notice the madison is not in fedora rawhide
repository, is this another reason we should use
sepolgen?


--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.