Re: [PATCH 2/2] Virtual ethernet device driver

[Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>]

Pavel Emelianov wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>>Pavel Emelianov wrote:
>>
>>>+	if (data != NULL && data[VETH_INFO_PEER] != NULL) {
>>>+		err = nla_parse_nested(tb, IFLA_INFO_MAX,
>>>+				data[VETH_INFO_PEER], ifla_policy);
>>>+		if (err < 0)
>>>+			return err;
>>>+	}
>>
>>
>>One more suggestion regarding the PEER attribute: you only nest
>>IFLA attributes below it, but some information that might be
>>interesting to use on device creation is contained in ifinfomsg
>>(flags and ifindex). So I think it would be better to use a
>>complete message, including header.
> 
> 
> I don't get it. Can you elaborate, please.


You don't have a struct ifinfomsg for the peer device. At some
point we might want to add support for specifying initial flags
for the device (some easily supportable ones are IFF_PROMISC,
IFF_ALLMULTI, IFF_NOARP) and ideally that should also be possible
for the peer device.

So I suggest you use a complete ifinfomsg including the header
instead of just the attributes for VETH_INFO_PEER.