From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from imap.sh.mvista.com (unknown [63.81.120.155]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F09DDE30 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:45:36 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46965B28.7000703@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 20:47:36 +0400 From: Sergei Shtylyov MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.21-rt2] PowerPC: revert fix for threaded fasteoi IRQ handlers References: <200611192243.34850.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> <200705171719.34968.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> In-Reply-To: <200705171719.34968.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@mvista.com List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, I wrote: > Revert the change to the "fasteoi" type chips as after handle_fasteoi_irq() had > been fixed, they've become meaningless (and even dangerous -- as was the case > with Celleb that has been fixed earlier)... > Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > --- > The patch in question wasn't even initially accepted but then was erroneously > restored along with the TOD patch. I've asked to revert it but to no avail, > so here's the formal patch to revert it at last... Now that the -rt patch has been first release in the broken-out version, let me tell you that the following 3 patches in the series can be just annihilated: preempt-irqs-ppc-ack-irq-fixups.patch preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-b5.patch preempt-irqs-ppc-fix-more-fasteoi.patch as all that the latter two are doing is undoing the former one. WBR, Sergei