From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: Better handling of local changes in 'gitk'? Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:33:02 +0200 Organization: eudaptics software gmbh Message-ID: <469754DE.4A4EE499@eudaptics.com> References: <18071.19489.6733.665052@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Linus Torvalds To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jul 13 12:32:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1I9IRi-0006IU-TP for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:32:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754804AbXGMKcT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:32:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754784AbXGMKcT (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:32:19 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:54985 "EHLO ciao.gmane.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754734AbXGMKcS (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jul 2007 06:32:18 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1I9IRX-0007Rf-TJ for git@vger.kernel.org; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:32:11 +0200 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:32:11 +0200 Received: from J.Sixt by cm56-163-160.liwest.at with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:32:11 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm56-163-160.liwest.at X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Paul Mackerras wrote: > Try this, let me know what you think. I called the changes in the > working directory "Local uncommitted changes, not checked in to index" > and the changes in the index "Local changes checked in to index but > not committed". If you prefer some other wording, let me know. Maybe you go with git-gui's wording: Index: Staged changes WD: Unstaged changes -- Hannes