From: Mark Lord <liml@rtr.ca>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>,
Suleiman Souhlal <ssouhlal@freebsd.org>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Make the IDE DMA timeout modifiable
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2007 15:36:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4697D425.7000300@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4697987E.3040406@ru.mvista.com>
Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Mark Lord wrote:
>
>>> O> >> BTW, why the timeout is so damn long? 2*WAIT_CMD is 20 secs,
>>> and if DMA is not complete or interrupt pending, it may wait 10 more secs...
..
>> I've lost the original question from this thread, but the idea of the
>
> The original question concerned specifically the DMA command timeout
> which is twice more than the usual one, WAIT_CMD (10 seconds).
>
>> longish
>> timeouts was that drive *may* be spun down ("standby"), and thus have
>> to spin
>> up again to complete media commands. Back then, drives were much
>> slower at
>> spinning up than nowadays, and the ATA spec says to allow up to 30
>> seconds.
>
> Well, that doesn't explain the DMA case.
When a drive is in standby, we don't send it anything special to wake up.
So even DMA commands have to have a long enough timeout to allow
for spinning up.
Cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-13 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 1:19 [PATCH 1/3] Make the IDE DMA timeout modifiable Suleiman Souhlal
2007-02-21 1:44 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-02-21 2:13 ` Suleiman Souhlal
2007-02-21 2:42 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-06-12 19:11 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-06-15 23:23 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-07-10 19:10 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-13 15:16 ` Alan Cox
2007-07-13 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2007-07-13 15:21 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-13 19:36 ` Mark Lord [this message]
2007-07-13 19:40 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-13 19:46 ` Mark Lord
2007-07-13 20:03 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-13 21:00 ` Mark Lord
2007-07-16 19:29 ` Rogier Wolff
2007-07-17 14:18 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-13 20:08 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-07-13 20:54 ` Mark Lord
2007-07-13 21:00 ` Mark Lord
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4697D425.7000300@rtr.ca \
--to=liml@rtr.ca \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=ssouhlal@freebsd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.