From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [62.27.45.185] (helo=argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IAPD7-0002qK-98 for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:57:53 +0200 Received: from pd9538514.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.83.133.20] helo=olympus.klever.net) by argo.arachnion.zzZZzz.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.42) id 1IAPCi-0007JY-Ez for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:57:28 +0200 Message-ID: <469B5C97.5020805@klever.net> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:55:03 +0200 From: Michael Krelin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070619) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org References: <200707161244020000@086416296> In-Reply-To: <200707161244020000@086416296> Subject: Re: [oe-commits] org.oe.dev python-pyqt: fix dbg packaging X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 11:57:55 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> Because it seems to be the standard? Because ml5 would seem to suggest >> this is the fifth release from Mickey which in this case is not true? >> Because going from ml to r should not cause problems? > >> Because of the reasons above I did not really see any need for >> discussion. I somehow still don't. > > because you are stepping on toes of one of the oldest oe devs while we are all out of contact on way to guadec. Do you really think Mickey would object it? Let him speak, maybe, before making so much noise? I, personally, think that contacting Mickey would be the right thing to do before proceeding with that, but I still don't think it can be considered offensive. Love, H