From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762052AbXGPTzr (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:55:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753214AbXGPTzj (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:55:39 -0400 Received: from einhorn.in-berlin.de ([192.109.42.8]:51690 "EHLO einhorn.in-berlin.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751614AbXGPTzi (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jul 2007 15:55:38 -0400 X-Envelope-From: stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de Message-ID: <469BCD11.4070803@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:54:57 +0200 From: Stefan Richter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.4) Gecko/20070609 SeaMonkey/1.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab CC: "Robert P. J. Day" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: how about bringing Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt up to date? References: <469BCAB2.5060909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <469BCAB2.5060909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I wrote: > Robert P. J. Day wrote: >> as time goes by, the informational value of the feature removal file >> is rapidly approaching zero, as alleged deadlines for removal are >> continually dismissed, while some removal dates as far back as 2005 >> are still in that file. >> >> if those features aren't going to be removed, then will someone at >> least recalibrate their removal dates and update that file? Also remember to update contact addresses. > What: Video4Linux API 1 ioctls and video_decoder.h from Video devices. > When: December 2006 -Who: Mauro Carvalho Chehab +Who: Mauro Carvalho Chehab -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== -=== =---- http://arcgraph.de/sr/