From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Curry Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 08:37:41 +0000 Subject: [KJ] Do you work for a living? Message-Id: <469C7FD5.4020602@netonline.gr> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org SZSN Sales UP 30%! Market Watchers Pick SZSN. Shandong Zhouyuan Seed and Nursery Co., Ltd (SZSN) $0.43 UP 30% Sales reports show sales up 37.6% over last year. OTCPicks.com and RedHotPennyStock.com feature SZSN. Stock UP 30%! Get on SZSN first thing Tuesday! I like YouTube, even if most of its users are depressingly inane. then someone else will come along in however much time and start using them again. And it's going to be exactly what he deserves. I can't honestly think of a single thing on the internet that can be physically stolen and become irreplacable. I've got to jump through their hoops. Typically there are a hundred or so Ogre NPCs gathered around the base of the arena tower dancing about. It's basic copyright. But, to take the example of Tur's product, these aren't things that you could for instance find in a blockbuster. Is this actually happening? This argument will hold water the day someone is convicted of theft when they've only been infringing copyrights. Taking a photo of a painting is somewhat different to taking the physical painting. By any reasonable stretch, people ought to be in the streets demanding Bush's impeachment, along with Cheney. No, it must be a technical violation, something like the warrantless surveillance. That's what the RIAA has done for me. Then something important occurred to me. It needs to be taught a lesson. Amounts to the same thing, though: money out of the copyright holder's pocket. It's not enough to email. because he is seeking more institutionally to cripple checks and balances and the authority of Congress and the judiciary to superintend his assertions of power. You may not be a big thief, but I think it's important that we call things by their names. Do you work for a living? Just as the owners of Pets. I am not so sure anymore. I think they're a little bit more worrisome than Clinton's. Maybe I should get paid for a page of text, and paragraphs go free? And I'd never seen the one amateur looking video in there "Dance First". Amounts to the same thing, though: money out of the copyright holder's pocket. Whether or not it is OK is a different question, but I don't think the distinction in conduct is that difficult to comprehend. If anything is fucked up here, it's our copyright laws. They are complying with the terms of the DMCA. But if it's rampantly copied and freely available, that value drops to near zero, because no one is interested in purchasing it from you. _______________________________________________ REMINDER: this mailing list moved to vger.kernel.org and current one will be discontinued soon. To resubscribe, send email to majordomo@vger.kernel.org with "subscribe kernel-janitors" in message body and follow instructions. Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors