From: "Miguel Angel Alvarez" <ma.alvarez@ziv.es>
To: <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Cc: tnt@246tNt.com
Subject: mpc52xx: Correct calculation of FEC RX errors???
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 13:39:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469DFC03.9080201@ziv.es> (raw)
Hi
We are showing figures of more than 4 billion error frames in our=20
ethernet interfaces. We have tested that the problem is in a=20
substraction (the number of errors decrements with the number of =
frames).
So... looking in the fec driver (fec.c) for the calculations we have=20
seen that the number of multicast packets is added to the number of=20
correct frames in order to get the frame errors...
But the interesting thing is that we have checked that this calculation=20
is something that we have added with a patch by Grzegorz Bernacki in=20
this list.
So... The funny thing is... Why a patch that solves the problem for=20
Grzegorz produces "the same problem" for us?
And... by the way... I have seen IEEE802.3, and when they talk about=20
aFramesReceivedOK (which I suppose is the ieee_r_frame_ok in the=20
driver), and they do not say a word about not including multicast=20
packets in it...
Any comment will be appreciate.
Miguel =C1ngel =C1lvarez
**=20
=20
----------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE =
-------------------------------------------
This message, along with any attachments, may be confidential or legally =
privileged.=20
It is intended only for the named person(s), who is/are the only =
authorized recipients.
If this message has reached you in error, kindly destroy it without =
review and notify the sender immediately.
Thank you for your help.
ZIV uses virus scanning software but excludes any liability for viruses =
contained in any attachment.
=20
------------------------------------ ROGAMOS LEA ESTE TEXTO =
-------------------------------
Este mensaje y sus anexos pueden contener informaci=F3n confidencial y/o =
con derecho legal.=20
Est=E1 dirigido =FAnicamente a la/s persona/s o entidad/es rese=F1adas =
como =FAnico destinatario autorizado.
Si este mensaje le hubiera llegado por error, por favor elim=EDnelo sin =
revisarlo ni reenviarlo y notif=EDquelo inmediatamente al remitente. =
Gracias por su colaboraci=F3n. =20
ZIV utiliza software antivirus, pero no se hace responsable de los virus =
contenidos en los ficheros anexos.
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-18 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-18 11:39 Miguel Angel Alvarez [this message]
2007-07-18 11:45 ` mpc52xx: Correct calculation of FEC RX errors??? Sylvain Munaut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469DFC03.9080201@ziv.es \
--to=ma.alvarez@ziv.es \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tnt@246tNt.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.