From: Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>
To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] patches vs. 2.6.22 for release - last chance
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 21:28:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469E85F0.6000406@hhs.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070718203038.GC3406@jupiter.solarsys.private>
Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> I'm back from my vacation, and of course the email has piled up.
>
> Linus released 2.6.22 so I've updated my testing and release trees; they are
> now identical:
>
> http://lm-sensors.org/kernel?p=kernel/mhoffman/hwmon-2.6.git;a=shortlog;h=release
>
> Unless I hear good reasons, I'll ask Linus to pull from this tomorrow.
>
> Also, I realize there's still a backlog of patches. In the past, Linus has
> not objected to merging brand new drivers in addition to bugfixes after -rc1,
> so I think there is still the chance to get some of these in if we can work
> quickly. Unfortunately, the alarm file patches qualify as neither of these,
> so they'll have to wait until the next round.
>
Mark can you please drop the:
"hwmon: fix Abit Uguru3 driver detection on some motherboards" Patch, there is
an updated version in your inbox with skips the dmi vendor check when the force
module param is present.
If that is a problem I can make that an incremental patch.
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-18 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-18 20:30 [lm-sensors] patches vs. 2.6.22 for release - last chance Mark M. Hoffman
2007-07-18 21:28 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2007-07-18 21:50 ` Juerg Haefliger
2007-07-19 5:50 ` Krzysztof Helt
2007-07-19 14:04 ` Hans de Goede
2007-07-19 18:26 ` Mark M. Hoffman
2007-07-19 18:27 ` Hans de Goede
2007-07-24 11:59 ` Mark M. Hoffman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469E85F0.6000406@hhs.nl \
--to=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.