From: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] User stack pointer randomisation
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:19:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <469F56CF.2080409@innova-card.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070719120130.GB16258@linux-mips.org>
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:47:19PM +0200, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>
>> this is weird I would have defined them like this instead:
>>
>> #if (_MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI32)
>> #define ALSZ 8
>> #elif (_MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_NABI32) || (_MIPS_SIM == _MIPS_SIM_ABI64)
>> #define ALSZ 16
>> #endif
>>
>> #define ALMASK (~(ALSZ-1))
>
> <asm/asm.h> which is fairly similar to it's userspace equivalent
> <sys/asm.h> contains definitions which are some sort of
> pseudo-standard in the MIPS world, including ALSZ and ALMASK. If I
> had choosen them I'd have set ALSZ to 8 rsp. 16, just like you ...
> Anyway, having similar macros makes porting of assembler code
> easier. This also is why <asm/regdef.h> and <asm/fpregdef.h> are as
> they are. RISC/os, IRIX, some of the BSD variants, even the
> non-Linux SDE variants for example for baremetal use a similar set
> of macros and headers.
Thanks for explanations.
That makes me think that we may have the same alignement issue in
include/asm-mips/ptrace.h header file:
struct pt_regs {
#ifdef CONFIG_32BIT
/* Pad bytes for argument save space on the stack. */
unsigned long pad0[6];
#endif
/* Saved main processor registers. */
unsigned long regs[32];
/* Saved special registers. */
unsigned long cp0_status;
unsigned long hi;
unsigned long lo;
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_HAS_SMARTMIPS
unsigned long acx;
#endif
unsigned long cp0_badvaddr;
unsigned long cp0_cause;
unsigned long cp0_epc;
#ifdef CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMTC
unsigned long cp0_tcstatus;
#endif /* CONFIG_MIPS_MT_SMTC */
} __attribute__ ((aligned (8)));
Note that the structure is aligned on a 8 bytes boundary which is not
correct for a 64 bit kernel, is it ?
Thanks
Franck
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-19 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-19 7:10 [RFC] User stack pointer randomisation Franck Bui-Huu
2007-07-19 9:43 ` Nigel Stephens
2007-07-19 11:36 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-07-19 11:14 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-07-19 11:47 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-07-19 12:01 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-07-19 12:19 ` Franck Bui-Huu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=469F56CF.2080409@innova-card.com \
--to=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.