From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mats Petersson Subject: RE: SoftIce on HVM Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:31:10 +0100 Message-ID: <469dde0a.1c89420a.0d4c.ffffba2f@mx.google.com> References: <469dd055.02ba420a.29e4.7b65@mx.google.com> <9392A06CB0FDC847B3A530B3DC174E7B02FBB7A2@mse10be1.mse10.exchange.ms> <9392A06CB0FDC847B3A530B3DC174E7B02FBB7A2@mse10be1.mse10.ex change.ms> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Return-path: In-Reply-To: <9392A06CB0FDC847B3A530B3DC174E7B02FBB7A2@mse10be1.mse10.ex change.ms> References: <469dd055.02ba420a.29e4.7b65@mx.google.com> <9392A06CB0FDC847B3A530B3DC174E7B02FBB7A2@mse10be1.mse10.exchange.ms> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Guy Zana , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org At 09:40 18/07/2007, Guy Zana wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: mats petersson [mailto:mats.o.petersson@googlemail.com] > > On Behalf Of Mats Petersson > > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 11:33 AM > > To: Guy Zana; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] SoftIce on HVM > > > > At 09:24 18/07/2007, Guy Zana wrote: > > >Content-class: urn:content-classes:message > > >Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > > > boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7C915.74387B5F" > > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Did someone install Softice successfully inside an HVM? > > > > > > Haven't tried it, but I don't see why it shouldn't work - what > > problem(s) are you seeing? > >A 0x8e bugcheck (KERNEL_MODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED) >Haven't looked at it thoroughly but the address falls inside ntoskrnl.exe >This happens when I start softice. What's the rest of the error codes (particularly the first parameter after 0x8e)? Is this on a SVM or VT machine? -- Mats > > > > >Any kind of Windows kernel debugging practices are appreciated :-) > > > > Have you tried WindBag (windbg)? > >Yep, It is extremely slow, IIRC I had some problems with non >breaking breakpoints ;-) >(I tried a 19200 baud rate serial connection) > >Any case, I prefer SoftIce, but if that's not possible than I'll >have to work something out with windbg. > >Thanks, >Guy.