From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IBgVf-0008P3-El
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:38:19 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1IBgVd-0008Ok-4y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:38:18 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IBgVc-0008Od-TF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:38:16 -0400
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.232])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <anthony@codemonkey.ws>) id 1IBgVc-0001RL-JG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:38:16 -0400
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h31so678017wxd
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <46A003F4.3060104@codemonkey.ws>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:38:12 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu 0.9.0 win32 PXE boot can't work
References: <a0ea16650707190657j21c9c4a1rc1af013670cb8d31@mail.gmail.com>	<469F8722.3030104@codemonkey.ws>
	<a0ea16650707191725k74b3fdb6h1f74db6daa1af869@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <a0ea16650707191725k74b3fdb6h1f74db6daa1af869@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

??? wrote:
>
>
>     Can you try using the other nic types? I'm most interested in the
>     results with the rtl8139 model. 
>
> I have used rtl8139 the first time.Does not work.
> I think the etherboot is OK. because I can use it to boot from vmware.
> and the ethereal captured the DHCP offer packet on tap nic.
> How the tap-win32 and qemu deal with this packet?
> I can't trace it.

You're using tap-win32? I have no idea how well tap-win32 works with 
PXE... That would be my suspicion.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori