From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: gateway failover with linux
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 18:35:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A3A384.9030400@riverviewtech.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070719172500.GA25266@toroid.org>
On 7/20/2007 9:18 PM, Mohan Sundaram wrote:
> In VRRP based gateway pairs, this is normally done by partitioning
> the LAN to use both gateways by different subnets. i.e G1 is primary
> for subnet1 with G2 as secondary; G2 is primary for subnet2 with G1
> as secondary. This is done by defining multiple vrrp groups. AFAIK,
> no dynamic balancing methods/ features exist.
Agreed, this would be the easiest to implement active / active with
traffic flowing out through both routers. I was trying to state that
outbound for the network would flow through one router while inbound
would flow through the other router. This could also be extended to
mirror the multiple subnets like you are talking about too, though I
think load sharing reasoning would be lost at that point as you have
more traffic on both routers. At this point in time it would come down
to statistics of network load to see how you wanted to do it.
I'm sure there are ways that you can have all traffic spread across both
routers in either direction. Though I'm not quite sure how to go about
it. I'm going to say that VRRP / Load Balancing / Bridging / Layer 2
Filtering / and other services would be in effect to divide the traffic
across both active routers. No matter how you slice it, this is beyond
the scope of the OPs question. I was merely stating that things are
possible.
Grant. . . .
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list
LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-22 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-19 17:37 [LARTC] Re: gateway failover with linux Abhijit Menon-Sen
2007-07-20 1:32 ` Abhijit Menon-Sen
2007-07-20 1:44 ` Mohan Sundaram
2007-07-20 15:12 ` Grant Taylor
2007-07-20 15:15 ` Grant Taylor
2007-07-21 0:41 ` Abhijit Menon-Sen
2007-07-22 18:23 ` Grant Taylor
2007-07-22 18:35 ` Grant Taylor [this message]
2007-07-31 18:52 ` Abhijit Menon-Sen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A3A384.9030400@riverviewtech.net \
--to=gtaylor@riverviewtech.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.