From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
jbeulich@novell.com, zach@vmware.com, patches@x86-64.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [2/11] x86: Fix alternatives and kprobes to remap write-protected kernel text
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:17:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A61821.3070703@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070724135750.GD26634@Krystal>
Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
>
> Good catch. I also still wonder why alternative (except alternative smp,
> which is ok) and paravirt patching functions are not marked __init. I really
> hope they are never used when NMI, MCE are enabled or when threads may
> have been preempted in the site being patched, or it could result in an
> illegal instruction.
>
We need to patch modules at load time. Presumably an NMI/MCE handler
will not depend on code in a being-loaded module.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-24 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-20 15:32 [PATCH] [0/11] Some more x86 patches for review Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [1/11] i386: Reserve the right performance counter for the Intel PerfMon NMI watchdog Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [2/11] x86: Fix alternatives and kprobes to remap write-protected kernel text Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:59 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-23 14:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-23 15:01 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 15:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-24 6:06 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-24 13:57 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-24 15:17 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-07-24 15:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [3/11] x86: Stop MCEs and NMIs during code patching Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-20 16:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [4/11] x86_64: Set K8 CPUID flag for K8/Fam10h/Fam11h Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [5/11] x86: Unify alternative nop handling between i386 and x86-64 Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [6/11] i386: Tune AMD Fam10h/11h like K8 Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [7/11] i386: Do not include other cpus' interrupt 0 in nmi_watchdog Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [8/11] x86_64: x86_64 - Use non locked version for local_cmpxchg() Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [9/11] x86: Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions Andi Kleen
2007-07-21 12:00 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2007-07-21 12:04 ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-22 10:45 ` Juergen Beisert
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [10/11] i386: Handle P6s without performance counters in nmi watchdog Andi Kleen
2007-07-20 15:32 ` [PATCH] [11/11] i386: Use patchable lock prefix in set_64bit Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A61821.3070703@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
--cc=jbeulich@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@x86-64.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.