All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Satyam Sharma <ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] i386: bitops: Kill volatile-casting of memory addresses
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 13:39:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A63964.7000900@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0707241017440.3607@woody.linux-foundation.org>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> And before we remove that "volatile", we'd better make damn sure that 
> there isn't any driver that does
> 
> 	/* Wait for the command queue to be cleared by DMA */
> 	while (test_bit(...))
> 		;
> 
> or similar.
> 
> Yes, it's annoying, but this is a scary and subtle area. And we sadly 
> _have_ had code that does things like that.


I certainly cannot speak for all the grotty drivers out there, but I've 
never ever seen anything like the above.  I would consider anyone using 
kernel bit operations on DMA memory to be more than a little crazy.  But 
that's just me :)

Usually you will see

	while (1) {
		rmb();
		if (software_index == hardware_index_in_DMA_memory)
			break;
		
		... handle a unit of work ...
	}

Though ISTR being told that even rmb() was not sufficient in all cases 
[nonetheless, that's what I use in net and SATA drivers and email 
recommendations, and people seem happy]

	Jeff



  reply	other threads:[~2007-07-24 17:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-07-23 16:05 [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 1/8] i386: bitops: Update/correct comments Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 2/8] i386: bitops: Rectify bogus "Ir" constraints Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:10   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:21     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:30       ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:36         ` Jan Hubicka
2007-07-23 18:05         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-23 18:28           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-23 17:57   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-23 18:14     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 18:32       ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 18:39     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-07-23 18:52       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 3/8] i386: bitops: Rectify bogus "+m" constraints Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:37   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 17:15     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:46   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  9:22     ` David Howells
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 4/8] i386: bitops: Kill volatile-casting of memory addresses Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:52   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  4:19     ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  6:23       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  7:16         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  9:49     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24 17:20       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 17:39         ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-07-25  4:54         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 5/8] i386: bitops: Contain warnings fallout from the death of volatiles Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:05 ` [PATCH 6/8] i386: bitops: Don't mark memory as clobbered unnecessarily Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:13   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:26     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:33       ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 17:12         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:49           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 17:55   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  9:52     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24 17:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 17:42         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-24 18:13           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 18:28             ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-24 21:37             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24 21:55               ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-24 22:32                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-25  4:10                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 21:36         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-07-24  3:57   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  6:38     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  7:24       ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  8:29         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  8:39           ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  8:38         ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-24 19:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 20:37             ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-24 20:08               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 21:31                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-24 21:46                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26  1:07             ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-26  1:18               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-26  1:22                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24  9:44       ` David Howells
2007-07-24 10:02         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:06 ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__ Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:18   ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:22     ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__ II Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 16:32     ` [PATCH 7/8] i386: bitops: Kill needless usage of __asm__ __volatile__ Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 16:23   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 16:43     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 17:39       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 18:07         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-23 18:28           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 20:29             ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-23 20:40               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-23 21:06                 ` Trent Piepho
2007-07-23 21:30               ` Andi Kleen
2007-07-23 21:48                 ` Nicholas Miell
2007-07-23 16:06 ` [PATCH 8/8] i386: bitops: smp_mb__{before, after}_clear_bit() definitions Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  3:53   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  7:34     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24  7:48       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-24  8:31         ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  8:20       ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24  9:21         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24 10:25           ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 11:10             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24 11:32               ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 11:45                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-24 12:01                   ` Nick Piggin
2007-07-24 17:12                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-07-24 19:01                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-30 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/8] i386: bitops: Cleanup, sanitize, optimize Denis Vlasenko
2007-07-31  1:07   ` Satyam Sharma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46A63964.7000900@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=ssatyam@cse.iitk.ac.in \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.