Re: Building auxiliary tools in qmake2-native

[Lorn Potter <lpotter@trolltech.com>]

Michael Krelin wrote:
>> Will the opie-lrelease-native work? If not, a lrelease-native package
>> sounds like the way to go.
> 
> I'd guess opie-lrelease-native is a bit outdated for qt4, but I've never 
> used it, so I'm not sure.

Yes, lrelease is version specific.


> That wasn't a question of whether we should use build system's qt tools, 
> it was about not splitting qt into many native packages, but rather 
> using a single qt-native, since, for instance, qmake2-native has to 
> build half a qt, anyway, to support qt3 compatibility layer. I don't 
> think dropping qt3support is a feasible option. If not, then, of course 
> adding a missing lrelease-native is the way to go.


If you configure with qt3-support in qt4, I think you won't get all of 
Qt 4's features, but I could be wrong, or it might have changed.



-- 
Lorn 'ljp' Potter
Software Engineer, Systems Group, MES, Trolltech