From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Vasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Cc: albertl@mail.com, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: unexpected scsi timeout
Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:42:37 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A6FEED.2050403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A6FD8E.7090803@sw.ru>
Vasily Averin wrote:
> Albert Lee wrote:
>>>> Vasily Averin wrote:
>>>>> I've noticed that some scsi commands for DVD-drive attached to pata_via
>>>>> successfully finishes without any delays but reports about TIMEOUT condition. It
>>>>> happens because of ATA_ERR bit is set in status register. As result for each
>>>>> command Error Handler thread awakened, requests sense buffer and go to sleep again.
>>>> Need more info. Please post boot dmesg and the result of 'lspci -nn'
>>>> and 'hdparm -I /dev/srX' and when such errors occur.
>> Your log looks ok. It's normal for TEST_UNIT_READY to return ATA_ERR when no disc
>> inside and libata EH triggered to request sense.
>
> It's a bit strange for me, IMHO other scsi drivers requests sense buffer without
> EH thread assistance.
> Currently we know that ATA_ERR can be returned; it is not error, but one of
> expected responses. Why we cannot request sense without EH? I would like to
> understand is it implementation drawback or I missed something probably?
That was a design choice. It's easier to implement that way.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-25 7:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-20 12:02 unexpected scsi timeout Vasily Averin
2007-07-24 8:20 ` Tejun Heo
2007-07-24 10:07 ` Vasily Averin
2007-07-25 5:50 ` Albert Lee
2007-07-25 7:36 ` Vasily Averin
2007-07-25 7:42 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2007-07-25 13:06 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A6FEED.2050403@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=albertl@mail.com \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vvs@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.