From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
Subject: NFSv4 poops itself
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:53:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46A9EAB0.3090306@garzik.org> (raw)
Background:
Server: x86-64 dual core Intel, kernel 2.6.23-rc1 (my home fileserver)
Exporting NFS/NFSv4 mounts. Client count: 1 Uptime: 4 days
Client: x86-64 dual core Intel, kernel 2.6.23-rc1 (my main workstation)
NFS mount setup:
pretzel:/ on /g type nfs4 (rw,noatime,proto=tcp,addr=10.10.10.1)
Uptime: 4 days
Home directory mounted via NFSv4.
Problem:
My workstation has been happily talking to my file server for several
days without incident. An hour ago, my numeric keypad stopping working
(unrelated problem... USB or X bug?). The solution to the keypad
problem is usually to log out of X and log back in, or worse case, reboot.
So, I log out, and log back in. At first, a few shell windows open and
successfully initialize themselves (read bash profile over NFS, etc.)
Then, as more shell windows open, things start hanging. I can easily
switch to console and ssh to the fileserver, so it is clear this is an
NFS hang.
No adverse messages at all on the client.
On the server, I see NFSv4 spamming dmesg with hundreds of thousands of
messages:
Jul 27 08:20:53 pretzel kernel: NFSD: preprocess_seqid_op: old stateid!
Jul 27 08:21:24 pretzel last message repeated 167966 times
Jul 27 08:21:55 pretzel last message repeated 173628 times
Jul 27 08:21:55 pretzel kernel: NFSD: preprocess_seqid_op: old stateid!
Jul 27 08:22:26 pretzel last message repeated 171286 times
Jul 27 08:23:27 pretzel last message repeated 344461 times
Jul 27 08:23:30 pretzel last message repeated 18656 times
I rebooted the client, the problem disappeared, and everything is happy
again... but clearly NFSv4 shat itself. And now I am worried this will
happen again.
In all my quite-heavy use of NFSv4 I've never seen this behavior before,
so I would call this a regression.
I always run vanilla linux-2.6.git self-built kernels on both client and
server.
Jeff
next reply other threads:[~2007-07-27 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-27 12:53 Jeff Garzik [this message]
2007-07-27 13:33 ` NFSv4 poops itself Trond Myklebust
2007-07-27 17:09 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-27 17:16 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-27 17:29 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-03 19:13 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-06 13:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-06 18:40 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-27 18:29 ` Marc Dietrich
2007-07-27 13:36 ` Marc Dietrich
2007-07-27 13:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-07-27 14:45 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-07-27 14:58 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-07-27 17:58 ` Marc Dietrich
2007-07-27 18:39 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46A9EAB0.3090306@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.