All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <46AF28CF.6000302@student.ltu.se>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index a3eb6fd..c750075 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ Jan Engelhardt wrote:
 >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Yoann Padioleau wrote:
 >>     
 >>>  		buf = alloc_safe_buffer(device_info, ptr, size, dir);
->>> -		if (buf = 0) {
->>> +		if (buf = NULL) {
+>>> -		if (buf == 0) {
+>>> +		if (buf == NULL) {
 >>>       
 >> 		if (!buf)
 >> surely...
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Jan Engelhardt wrote:
 > Makes it look like it's used as a bool.
 >   
 But the conditional checking for a pointer and a boolean is the same; 0 
-= NULL = 'false' and the rest is valid/'true'. So IMHO it is a cleaner 
+== NULL == 'false' and the rest is valid/'true'. So IMHO it is a cleaner 
 way to write it. But then again, some people like to abuse the '!' on 
 "regular" variables.
 
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index ff56766..f8c4adb 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  "ref\0Pine.LNX.4.64.0707271250020.12711@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr\0"
  "From\0Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>\0"
  "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 02/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/arm\0"
- "Date\0Tue, 31 Jul 2007 12:19:27 +0000\0"
+ "Date\0Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:19:27 +0200\0"
  "To\0Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@computergmbh.de>\0"
  "Cc\0Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>"
   Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr>
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@
  ">> On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 11:44:07AM +0200, Yoann Padioleau wrote:\n"
  ">>     \n"
  ">>>  \t\tbuf = alloc_safe_buffer(device_info, ptr, size, dir);\n"
- ">>> -\t\tif (buf = 0) {\n"
- ">>> +\t\tif (buf = NULL) {\n"
+ ">>> -\t\tif (buf == 0) {\n"
+ ">>> +\t\tif (buf == NULL) {\n"
  ">>>       \n"
  ">> \t\tif (!buf)\n"
  ">> surely...\n"
@@ -29,10 +29,10 @@
  "> Makes it look like it's used as a bool.\n"
  ">   \n"
  "But the conditional checking for a pointer and a boolean is the same; 0 \n"
- "= NULL = 'false' and the rest is valid/'true'. So IMHO it is a cleaner \n"
+ "== NULL == 'false' and the rest is valid/'true'. So IMHO it is a cleaner \n"
  "way to write it. But then again, some people like to abuse the '!' on \n"
  "\"regular\" variables.\n"
  "\n"
  Richard Knutsson
 
-3fd217f512f7c313841a06ecbd01176dae0739d1da8ea0080aede5bdeda5d37b
+8c45b03b552d288a23eaa3d152b7ae44216ac848ce8e02fc9d4bc1ddb124ae19

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.