diff for duplicates of <46B062AF.1040907@student.ltu.se> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 712312f..406a703 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -13,19 +13,19 @@ Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> would be able to pick it out as i'm not familiar with what level that >>> thing runs at >>> ->> Didn't he mean "x = NULL" > "!x"? +>> Didn't he mean "x == NULL" > "!x"? >> > > i'm sure i understand your meaning of ">" ... are you saying that "x -> = NULL" is greater (preferred) to "!x" or are you saying that "x = +> == NULL" is greater (preferred) to "!x" or are you saying that "x == > NULL" should be changed to "!x" ? > If I understood Robin correctly, he suggested that checkpatch.pl would -tell to convert "x = NULL" to "!x", if that would be the preferred way. +tell to convert "x == NULL" to "!x", if that would be the preferred way. > i dont think the former case can be checked by checkpatch.pl, but the > latter certainly can ... but i'd be very skeptical you could get the -> wider LKML audience to sign off one way or the other wrt to "x = -> NULL" vs "!x". you can certainly get people to sign off on "x = 0" +> wider LKML audience to sign off one way or the other wrt to "x == +> NULL" vs "!x". you can certainly get people to sign off on "x == 0" > being wrong when x is a pointer. > I agree! diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index abfb7e3..c7d311e 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ "ref\08bd0f97a0708010303j7f443b06lf9d77f6d36816237@mail.gmail.com\0" "From\0Richard Knutsson <ricknu-0@student.ltu.se>\0" "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 06/68] 0 -> NULL, for arch/frv\0" - "Date\0Wed, 01 Aug 2007 10:38:39 +0000\0" + "Date\0Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:38:39 +0200\0" "To\0Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@gmail.com>\0" "Cc\0Robin Getz <rgetz@blackfin.uclinux.org>" Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr> @@ -32,19 +32,19 @@ ">>> would be able to pick it out as i'm not familiar with what level that\n" ">>> thing runs at\n" ">>> \n" - ">> Didn't he mean \"x = NULL\" > \"!x\"?\n" + ">> Didn't he mean \"x == NULL\" > \"!x\"?\n" ">> \n" ">\n" "> i'm sure i understand your meaning of \">\" ... are you saying that \"x\n" - "> = NULL\" is greater (preferred) to \"!x\" or are you saying that \"x =\n" + "> == NULL\" is greater (preferred) to \"!x\" or are you saying that \"x ==\n" "> NULL\" should be changed to \"!x\" ?\n" "> \n" "If I understood Robin correctly, he suggested that checkpatch.pl would \n" - "tell to convert \"x = NULL\" to \"!x\", if that would be the preferred way.\n" + "tell to convert \"x == NULL\" to \"!x\", if that would be the preferred way.\n" "> i dont think the former case can be checked by checkpatch.pl, but the\n" "> latter certainly can ... but i'd be very skeptical you could get the\n" - "> wider LKML audience to sign off one way or the other wrt to \"x =\n" - "> NULL\" vs \"!x\". you can certainly get people to sign off on \"x = 0\"\n" + "> wider LKML audience to sign off one way or the other wrt to \"x ==\n" + "> NULL\" vs \"!x\". you can certainly get people to sign off on \"x == 0\"\n" "> being wrong when x is a pointer.\n" "> \n" "I agree!\n" @@ -53,4 +53,4 @@ "\n" Richard Knutsson -eae5b702a73b9d5e2141d0bffe5b0fe7bb69b59d38203d1f646ed83a167d6c59 +4223696a80fed721fde4d8cf47fa94a7371993bf1351c2a2ffe70e67cd2aa667
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.