From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Christie Subject: Re: [RFC] Naming of dm-multipath hardware handler modules Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 12:06:30 -0500 Message-ID: <46B0BD96.6090601@cs.wisc.edu> References: <1185913012.4392.46.camel@linux-cxyg> <46B0B731.1070601@cs.wisc.edu> <46B0B7DB.9020208@cs.wisc.edu> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46B0B7DB.9020208@cs.wisc.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development List-Id: dm-devel.ids Mike Christie wrote: > Mike Christie wrote: >> And dm-emc.c should probably be changed, > > Oops scratch that. I am not sure. I think we talked about that and I was > not sure if there was going to be some userspcae bits like initrd tools > that might be looking for dm-emc instead of dm-mpath-emc. And well, I > was not sure if having dm-rdac be named dm-mpath-rdac might break tools > too, but I guess Alasdair was convinced it would be ok or he would not > have asked for the change. > Actually scrach that :) we should change dm-emc.c since we make the module name like the old style. I was thinking about some of the other alternatives that were brought up.