From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
Subject: Re: LVM on dmraid breakage
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:19:37 -0400
Message-ID: <46B0F8E9.5000609@cfl.rr.com>
References: <46B0EAEF.6090305@cfl.rr.com>
	<0EAFEA7F-BC32-4256-9C8E-3086756293C8@redhat.com>
Reply-To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <0EAFEA7F-BC32-4256-9C8E-3086756293C8@redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel>,
	<mailto:dm-devel-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>
List-Id: dm-devel.ids

Jonathan Brassow wrote:
> I'm not aware of a mechanism that LVM used to skip over owned devices... 
> there may exist one.  However, you could use lvm filters to skip those 
> underlying devices.
> 
>  brassow

LVM filters?

P.S. I would like to point out that because this mailing list munges the 
reply-to header, this conversation has been split even though I cross 
posted it to ataraid-list.