From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Grant Taylor <gtaylor@riverviewtech.net>
Subject: Re: NAT on stateless firewall ?
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 14:23:06 -0500
Message-ID: <46B3809A.6030707@riverviewtech.net>
References: <46B26400.7050504@andrei.myip.org>	<46B2FB97.3090605@plouf.fr.eu.org>	<46B3729A.8030605@andrei.myip.org>
	<46B37DD2.8020606@andrei.myip.org>
Reply-To: gtaylor+reply@riverviewtech.net
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
In-Reply-To: <46B37DD2.8020606@andrei.myip.org>
List-Id: <netfilter.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter>,
	<mailto:netfilter-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org

On 08/03/07 14:11, Florin Andrei wrote:
> It's not even necessary to play with proxy_arp in /proc. Just the IP
> alias and DNAT.

Right.  I did not think you would really need Proxy ARP, even before I
read why you wanted it.  Now that I have read why you wanted it I was
getting ready to reply stating such until I read this statement.



Grant. . . .