From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florin Andrei Subject: Re: NAT on stateless firewall ? Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 12:56:06 -0700 Message-ID: <46B38856.1020003@andrei.myip.org> References: <46B26400.7050504@andrei.myip.org> <46B2FB97.3090605@plouf.fr.eu.org> <46B3729A.8030605@andrei.myip.org> <46B37DD2.8020606@andrei.myip.org> <46B37EB5.3060803@rtij.nl> Reply-To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46B37EB5.3060803@rtij.nl> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Martijn Lievaart wrote: > > I think you could even get away with just creating a static arp entry. Like this? arp -s XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK -i eth0 -D eth0 pub I tested it, but it doesn't seem to work. I see the ARP requests, but the server does not respond to it. -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/