From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Taylor Subject: Re: Iptables rules processing Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 15:24:10 -0500 Message-ID: <46B38EEA.7020506@riverviewtech.net> References: <20070803170735.GC7815@sid.toystory.lan> <001b01c7d5f4$91781110$0101000a@tanjian> <20070803174410.GA11029@sid.toystory.lan> <46B38221.2070108@riverviewtech.net> <46B38A2D.2030204@plouf.fr.eu.org> Reply-To: gtaylor+reply@riverviewtech.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46B38A2D.2030204@plouf.fr.eu.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Mail List - Netfilter On 08/03/07 15:03, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Don't you mean the 'multiport' match ? The 'mport' match was never > included in the vanilla kernel, is now deprecated and has been removed > from the latest iptables release (1.3.8). I don't ever use it so I can not say for sure, so "Yes". I just pulled up a man page of IPTables on the web and found it so I used it. Grant. . . .