From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martijn Lievaart Subject: Re: NAT on stateless firewall ? Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2007 22:37:34 +0200 Message-ID: <46B3920E.7080306@rtij.nl> References: <46B26400.7050504@andrei.myip.org> <46B2FB97.3090605@plouf.fr.eu.org> <46B3729A.8030605@andrei.myip.org> <46B37DD2.8020606@andrei.myip.org> <46B37EB5.3060803@rtij.nl> <46B38856.1020003@andrei.myip.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <46B38856.1020003@andrei.myip.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Florin Andrei wrote: > Martijn Lievaart wrote: >> >> I think you could even get away with just creating a static arp entry. > > Like this? > > arp -s XXX.YYY.ZZZ.KKK -i eth0 -D eth0 pub > > I tested it, but it doesn't seem to work. I see the ARP requests, but > the server does not respond to it. > Bugger. I don't see why, but you have another solution so it's not important. M4