From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936000AbXHHAHZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:07:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760867AbXHHAHG (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:07:06 -0400 Received: from shawidc-mo1.cg.shawcable.net ([24.71.223.10]:45366 "EHLO pd2mo1so.prod.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759623AbXHHAHD (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Aug 2007 20:07:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2007 18:05:50 -0600 From: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: i386: kernel boot fail at check_irq_resend:69 In-reply-to: To: Dave Young Cc: Li Yang-r58472 , hpa@zytor.com, LKML Message-id: <46B908DE.7030602@shaw.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dave Young wrote: >> On 8/7/07, Li Yang-r58472 wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org >>> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Dave Young >>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 2:32 PM >>> To: hpa@zytor.com >>> Cc: LKML >>> Subject: i386: kernel boot fail at check_irq_resend:69 >>> >>> Hi, >>> The kernerl 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 boot fail at check_irq_resend:69 >>> > if (WARN_ON_ONCE(desc->handle_irq != handle_edge_irq)) >>> > return; >> Failed? It's just a kernel Badness for me, and the boot can be finished. > > No, my kernel panic after this. noapic does not help too. > Regards > dave That warning should not cause a panic. Is there another message after it? -- Robert Hancock Saskatoon, SK, Canada To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/