From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phillip Susi Subject: Re: Re: LVM on dmraid breakage Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2007 17:00:06 -0400 Message-ID: <46BA2ED6.9090209@cfl.rr.com> References: <46B0EAEF.6090305@cfl.rr.com> <20070802065012.GA28687@percy.comedia.it> <46B1B5E1.1050406@redhat.com> <46B251BB.1010004@cfl.rr.com> <46B2798D.8000902@gmail.com> <20070807213714.GD2064@agk.fab.redhat.com> Reply-To: device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070807213714.GD2064@agk.fab.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: device-mapper development , "ATARAID (eg, Promise Fasttrak, Highpoint 370) related discussions" , linux-lvm@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 10:40:45AM +1000, David Robinson wrote: >> If you need LVM to only scan certain devices you should modify the >> filter line in lvm.conf. > > Yes, this is the current approach: a well-configured system would be > actively modifying the filters (with the help of udev) both on boot and > if device configurations change subsequently. No. The config files are for administrators to modify. Udev should not be automagically messing with things in /etc.