From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from buildserver.ru.mvista.com (unknown [85.21.88.6]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DD2DDE1E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 02:22:21 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <46BB3F00.6060802@ru.mvista.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2007 20:21:20 +0400 From: Valentine Barshak MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: Sequoia 440EPx patches not working References: <1186598710.5459.7.camel@laptop> <20070809030856.GC8261@localhost.localdomain> <46BAF36F.4030801@ru.mvista.com> <20070809083443.2b2f5407@zod.rchland.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20070809083443.2b2f5407@zod.rchland.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:58:55 +0400 > Valentine Barshak wrote: > >> David Gibson wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 01:45:10PM -0500, Jerone Young wrote: >>>> Using the Sequoia (AMCC 440EPx) patches recently submitted to the >>>> list I am unable to boot to fully boot a uImage built with these >>>> patches under Uboot. It appears to hang in very early boot. >>> I'm guessing this is an old version of u-boot, that's not device >>> tree aware. That would need a cuImage, not a uImage, and IIRC the >>> posted patches didn't yet have cuboot support for Sequoia. >>> >> The patches do have cuImage support. >> I have a Sequoia board with uBoot 1.1.6 and it boots cuImage fine. > > Speaking of those patches, are you planning on rebasing them against > the latest 4xx series I sent out soon? That should have some cleanups > that make adding sequoia support a bit easier. > > josh Yes, I do :)