From: Richard MUSIL <richard.musil@st.com>
To: Richard Musil <richard.musil@st.com>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GENETLINK]: Question: global lock (genl_mutex) possible refinement?
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:52:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46BC2751.70909@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46A5DDDD.6070602@st.com>
Hello Thomas,
I wonder, if you had time to take a look at the patch I posted back then.
Richard
----
Thomas Graf wrote:
> > Please provide a new overall patch which is not based on your
> > initial patch so I can review your idea properly.
Here it goes (merging two previous patches). I have diffed
against v2.6.22, which I am using currently as my base:
include/net/genetlink.h | 1 +
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 106 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
2 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/genetlink.h b/include/net/genetlink.h
index b6eaca1..681ad13 100644
--- a/include/net/genetlink.h
+++ b/include/net/genetlink.h
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ struct genl_family
struct nlattr ** attrbuf; /* private */
struct list_head ops_list; /* private */
struct list_head family_list; /* private */
+ struct mutex lock; /* private */
};
/**
diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
index b9ab62f..0104267 100644
--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
@@ -38,6 +38,32 @@ static void genl_unlock(void)
genl_sock->sk_data_ready(genl_sock, 0);
}
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(genl_fam_mutex); /* serialization for family list management */
+
+static inline void genl_fam_lock(struct genl_family *family)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&genl_fam_mutex);
+ if (family)
+ mutex_lock(&family->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void genl_fam_unlock(struct genl_family *family)
+{
+ if (family)
+ mutex_unlock(&family->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&genl_fam_mutex);
+}
+
+static inline void genl_onefam_lock(struct genl_family *family)
+{
+ mutex_lock(&family->lock);
+}
+
+static inline void genl_onefam_unlock(struct genl_family *family)
+{
+ mutex_unlock(&family->lock);
+}
+
#define GENL_FAM_TAB_SIZE 16
#define GENL_FAM_TAB_MASK (GENL_FAM_TAB_SIZE - 1)
@@ -150,9 +176,9 @@ int genl_register_ops(struct genl_family *family, struct genl_ops *ops)
if (ops->policy)
ops->flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_HASPOL;
- genl_lock();
+ genl_fam_lock(family);
list_add_tail(&ops->ops_list, &family->ops_list);
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
genl_ctrl_event(CTRL_CMD_NEWOPS, ops);
err = 0;
@@ -180,16 +206,16 @@ int genl_unregister_ops(struct genl_family *family, struct genl_ops *ops)
{
struct genl_ops *rc;
- genl_lock();
+ genl_fam_lock(family);
list_for_each_entry(rc, &family->ops_list, ops_list) {
if (rc == ops) {
list_del(&ops->ops_list);
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
genl_ctrl_event(CTRL_CMD_DELOPS, ops);
return 0;
}
}
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -216,8 +242,9 @@ int genl_register_family(struct genl_family *family)
goto errout;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&family->ops_list);
+ mutex_init(&family->lock);
- genl_lock();
+ genl_fam_lock(family);
if (genl_family_find_byname(family->name)) {
err = -EEXIST;
@@ -251,14 +278,14 @@ int genl_register_family(struct genl_family *family)
family->attrbuf = NULL;
list_add_tail(&family->family_list, genl_family_chain(family->id));
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
genl_ctrl_event(CTRL_CMD_NEWFAMILY, family);
return 0;
errout_locked:
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
errout:
return err;
}
@@ -275,7 +302,7 @@ int genl_unregister_family(struct genl_family *family)
{
struct genl_family *rc;
- genl_lock();
+ genl_fam_lock(family);
list_for_each_entry(rc, genl_family_chain(family->id), family_list) {
if (family->id != rc->id || strcmp(rc->name, family->name))
@@ -283,14 +310,16 @@ int genl_unregister_family(struct genl_family *family)
list_del(&rc->family_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&family->ops_list);
- genl_unlock();
+
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
+ mutex_destroy(&family->lock);
kfree(family->attrbuf);
genl_ctrl_event(CTRL_CMD_DELFAMILY, family);
return 0;
}
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(family);
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -303,38 +332,57 @@ static int genl_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
struct genlmsghdr *hdr = nlmsg_data(nlh);
int hdrlen, err;
+ genl_fam_lock(NULL);
family = genl_family_find_byid(nlh->nlmsg_type);
- if (family == NULL)
+ if (family == NULL) {
+ genl_fam_unlock(NULL);
return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
+ /* get particular family lock, but release global family lock
+ * so registering operations for other families are possible */
+ genl_onefam_lock(family);
+ genl_fam_unlock(NULL);
hdrlen = GENL_HDRLEN + family->hdrsize;
- if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(hdrlen))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (nlh->nlmsg_len < nlmsg_msg_size(hdrlen)) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
ops = genl_get_cmd(hdr->cmd, family);
- if (ops == NULL)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (ops == NULL) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
if ((ops->flags & GENL_ADMIN_PERM) &&
- security_netlink_recv(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN))
- return -EPERM;
+ security_netlink_recv(skb, CAP_NET_ADMIN)) {
+ err = -EPERM;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_DUMP) {
- if (ops->dumpit == NULL)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (ops->dumpit == NULL) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
- return netlink_dump_start(genl_sock, skb, nlh,
+ err = netlink_dump_start(genl_sock, skb, nlh,
ops->dumpit, ops->done);
+ goto unlock_out;
}
- if (ops->doit == NULL)
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (ops->doit == NULL) {
+ err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ goto unlock_out;
+ }
if (family->attrbuf) {
err = nlmsg_parse(nlh, hdrlen, family->attrbuf, family->maxattr,
ops->policy);
if (err < 0)
- return err;
+ goto unlock_out;
}
info.snd_seq = nlh->nlmsg_seq;
@@ -344,7 +392,11 @@ static int genl_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh)
info.userhdr = nlmsg_data(nlh) + GENL_HDRLEN;
info.attrs = family->attrbuf;
- return ops->doit(skb, &info);
+ err = ops->doit(skb, &info);
+
+unlock_out:
+ genl_onefam_unlock(family);
+ return err;
}
static void genl_rcv(struct sock *sk, int len)
@@ -425,7 +477,7 @@ static int ctrl_dumpfamily(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
int fams_to_skip = cb->args[1];
if (chains_to_skip != 0)
- genl_lock();
+ genl_fam_lock(NULL);
for (i = 0; i < GENL_FAM_TAB_SIZE; i++) {
if (i < chains_to_skip)
@@ -445,7 +497,7 @@ static int ctrl_dumpfamily(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
errout:
if (chains_to_skip != 0)
- genl_unlock();
+ genl_fam_unlock(NULL);
cb->args[0] = i;
cb->args[1] = n;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-20 12:52 [GENETLINK]: Question: global lock (genl_mutex) possible refinement? Richard MUSIL
2007-07-20 13:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-20 13:58 ` Richard MUSIL
2007-07-20 14:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-07-20 16:15 ` Richard MUSIL
2007-07-23 10:29 ` Thomas Graf
2007-07-23 16:45 ` Richard MUSIL
2007-07-24 9:35 ` Thomas Graf
2007-07-24 11:09 ` Richard MUSIL
2007-08-10 8:52 ` Richard MUSIL [this message]
2007-08-16 15:58 ` Thomas Graf
2007-08-17 8:38 ` Richard MUSIL
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46BC2751.70909@st.com \
--to=richard.musil@st.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.