From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46C0A02A.1010706@domain.hid> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 20:17:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46C02829.9020009@domain.hid> <46C04384.4030805@domain.hid> <46C05180.5090302@domain.hid> <46C05690.2010108@domain.hid> <46C063E0.1010809@domain.hid> <46C07005.8000504@domain.hid> <46C07EDC.4040305@domain.hid> <46C08D64.4050903@domain.hid> <46C09773.5070607@domain.hid> <46C09B86.3030709@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <46C09B86.3030709@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland Tollenaar Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] [Ethercatmaster-users] EML conflict with RTCAN? low_level_input framebuilding failed. Reply-To: rolandtollenaar@domain.hid List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Xenomai-help@domain.hid, EML users , rtnet-users Hi, >> The 64 is a value I got from the mailing list. How large can I make this >> and what am I compromising? > > Each buffer is slightly more than 1.5 KB heavy. Do your maths :). How > many buffers you need depend on how many incoming and outgoing frames > might be queued into they are processed. And that depends on the frame > rate and the time your EML stack has to handle it in the worst case. I > can't give you numbers on this, that depends on _your_ setup. That much is clear. Will make it big out of shear inability to calculate. The lost memory is of almost no concern. Thanks. Roland > > Jan >