From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <46C13B91.6020801@domain.hid> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 07:20:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <46C0719B.1010102@domain.hid> <46C07AF2.60402@domain.hid> <46C07D73.7070302@domain.hid> <46C080C8.10906@domain.hid> <46C0835E.8010105@domain.hid> <46C0B036.3030306@domain.hid> <46C0B1DF.6090509@domain.hid> <46C0B9F7.9060103@domain.hid> <46C0D686.6000007@domain.hid> In-Reply-To: <46C0D686.6000007@domain.hid> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Roland Tollenaar Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] rtcan bufferoverflow but no evidence Reply-To: rolandtollenaar@domain.hid List-Id: Help regarding installation and common use of Xenomai List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: xenomai-help Hi, > Recall that up to Xenomai 2.4 RTDM device/socket closing may fail (with > -EAGAIN) when some other thread is currently using it and doesn't > release it immediately when being "asked". That means for now you should > loop over [rt_dev_]close as long as EAGAIN is returned. Excellent thanks. I did not know this. Is xenomai 2.4 stable yet? Would you advise it as the version of choice at the moment? Roland > > Jan >