From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2007 06:52:35 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCHES] hwmon: update against ~v2.6.23-rc2 Message-Id: <46C15133.3020004@hhs.nl> List-Id: References: <11869444521807-git-send-email-mhoffman@lightlink.com> In-Reply-To: <11869444521807-git-send-email-mhoffman@lightlink.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Mark M. Hoffman wrote: > Hi Hans: > > * Hans de Goede [2007-08-12 21:21:23 +0200]: >> Mark M. Hoffman wrote: >>> The following four patches are in my hwmon-2.6.git/release branch. I will >>> ask >>> Linus to merge this branch very soon. >>> >> Any chance the f71882fg driver could make it in, the second version has >> been acked by Darrick J. Wong now, who reviewed the first version. >> >> Here is the mail with the patch: >> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2007-July/020441.html >> > > It's not going in before v2.6.23, if that's what you mean. I doubt Linus > would accept it even if I tried. It is very close to the head of my queue > though. Now that all the known regressions are dead, it will hit testing > (and therefore -mm) very soon. > Hmm, Can't you atleast try. It already has many users now (without any troubles, I'm about to upload a verified sensors.conf for a third motherboard using this driver), and was requested a lot because its a popular chip. I thought Linus didn't mind doing new drivers after the freeze as they cannot cause regressions (normally) snd I dislike the idea of this driver having to wait another cycle, I already submitted it at the end of the 2.6.22 cycle. Either way its your call. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors