From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brad House Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 07:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Buildroot] [patch] kernel-headers: lzma causing issues In-Reply-To: <1187165518.4942.6.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com> References: <46C24F7F.1020203@mainstreetsoftworks.com> <1187165518.4942.6.camel@elrond.sweden.atmel.com> Message-ID: <46C2E8DB.5020309@mainstreetsoftworks.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net >> +config BR2_KERNEL_HEADERS_LZMA >> + bool "use lzma initramfs kernel patches" >> + default y >> + help >> + Apply patches which allow for lzma compressed >> + initramfs filesystems. This requires the lzma >> + program in your development environment. >> + > > Since it also breaks unless you have lzma causing headache, > I think the default should be to not use the lzma patch... ok, yeah, I'd agree with that ... I was just maintaining compatibility for those who are using it by defaulting to y. > I am working on a new scheme where the target/linux and > toolchain/kernel-headers are integrated, but this > needs a lot more testing and will (as agreed with Bernhard > be reviewed before applied, but it seems reasonable > to do this as an intermediate fix. Ah, yeah, it would definitely make sense for those to be integrated. It took me a minute to realize the kernel headers version is what determined which release of the kernel got built ;) Thanks. -Brad