From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon 'corecode' Schubert Subject: Re: git-cvsexportcommit getting out of sync with CVS status requests Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:50 +0200 Message-ID: <46C3218E.6020309@fs.ei.tum.de> References: <1187178510.13096.46.camel@murta.transitives.com> <1187182726.13096.50.camel@murta.transitives.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: alex.bennee@transitive.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 15 17:54:06 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ILLC9-0003is-T0 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:54:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762608AbXHOPxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:53:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1762574AbXHOPxz (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:53:55 -0400 Received: from stella.fs.ei.tum.de ([129.187.54.7]:50488 "EHLO stella.fs.ei.tum.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762539AbXHOPxy (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:53:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.fs.ei.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEBD280E9; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:52 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fs.ei.tum.de Received: from stella.fs.ei.tum.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (stella.fs.ei.tum.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UPLpOXDvb0zO; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [128.178.149.21] (nslpc6.epfl.ch [128.178.149.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by stella.fs.ei.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DDF280E5; Wed, 15 Aug 2007 17:53:50 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070604) In-Reply-To: <1187182726.13096.50.camel@murta.transitives.com> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Alex Bennee wrote: > It looks like running a single CVS query for each file is the only > solution. I think internally CVS is doing single queries anyways. At least that was my impression. Or we find out which order cvs is reporting the status. Maybe a simple sort of the pathnames could be sufficient? cheers simon