From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: xenomai@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-help] RTDM context_size question
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 10:17:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C559A2.6090807@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C4BAB8.20103@domain.hid>
trem wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Steven Kauffmann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> When looking at the rtdm examples tut01-skeleton en tut02-skeleton, I have a
>>> question about the context_size in the rtdm_device struct.
>>>
>>> In tut01-skeleton-drv.c, the context_size = sizeof(buffer_t), in the other
>>> example context_size = 0. Both drivers uses the
>>> rtdm_safe_copy_to_user/rtdm_safe_copy_from_user functions to write/read data
>>> from buffer_t(kernel space) to user_space. So I don't understand why the
>>> context_size in tut02 is different than in tut01. Or is the context_size
>>> only important if we open the driver several times from one or more
>>> user_space programs?
>> The context size is important in case you want to attach some data to
>> each opened instance of a device. Hmm, but this is something neither
>> tut01 nor tut02 deals with optimally. tut02 cannot use a context-based
>> buffer, because it uses two device instances (opened by two instances of
>> the user space program) to transfer the data. But tut01 could use some
>> global buffer as well without loosing a feature.
>>
>> Philippe (trem), could you rework tut01 and make it use a global buffer
>> instead? Then some tut03 would be nice to explain what per context, per
>> device, and global data means. I've seen confusion about this fairly
>> often, so a dedicated tutorial would be great.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jan
>>
> Hi
>
> I've used per device buffer in tut01 and global buffer in tut02 to show
> the difference between them. But it seems that it's not very clear. And
> as the tut01 is just here as first rtdm example, it should be as simple
> as possible.
>
> So yes, using global buffer in tut01 and tut02 could be done, and I will
> add a tut03 to show the context.
>
> tutorial index :
> - tut01 : first rtdm program
> you can read and write in this device (tut01-skeleton-drv01). All data
> are global, so I two program read it, they will read the same thing.
>
> - tut02 : show synchronization
> you can only read in the device (tut02-skeleton-drv01) if a write has
> been done before (by this program or another program). data and
> semaphore are global.
>
> - tut03 : show device context
> we can use tut01, and just put data to context. So a program can't read
> data written by another program. For example, P1 and P2 two programs.
>
> with tut01, the sequence is :
> P1 : write "I'm P1" to tut01-skeleton-drv01
> P2 : write "I'm P2" to tut01-skeleton-drv01
> P1 : read "I'm P2" from tut01-skeleton-drv01
> P2 : read "I'm P2" from tut01-skeleton-drv01
>
> with tut03, the sequence is :
> P1 : write "I'm P1" to tut03-skeleton-drv01
> P2 : write "I'm P2" to tut03-skeleton-drv01
> P1 : read "I'm P1" from tut03-skeleton-drv01
> P2 : read "I'm P2" from tut03-skeleton-drv01
>
>
> I'm on the right way ?
Basically, yes. But I would even put all three associations into the
same example, may be letting the tut-device user select the data
destination via an IOCTL: local, device, global. That would should
clearly the association - and would also introduce a first, simple IOCTL
mechanism.
>
> If yes, I'll do it ASAP.
>
> regards,
> Philippe
>
Thanks,
Jan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 12:04 [Xenomai-help] RTDM context_size question Steven Kauffmann
2007-08-16 17:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-08-16 20:59 ` trem
2007-08-17 8:17 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2007-08-17 22:43 ` trem
[not found] ` <46C5E4AC.1090608@domain.hid>
2007-08-18 6:34 ` [Xenomai-core] " Jan Kiszka
2007-08-20 21:15 ` trem
[not found] ` <46C9FFDA.8030200@domain.hid>
2007-08-23 20:33 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-08-23 20:43 ` trem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C559A2.6090807@domain.hid \
--to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.