From: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
To: GolovaSteek <golovasteek@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nanosleep() accuracy
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:08:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C581A0.7090000@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f40fb4250708170044q9a259c3wb50186880d6b7f51@mail.gmail.com>
GolovaSteek wrote:
> 2007/8/17, Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>:
>
>> GolovaSteek skrev:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>> I need use sleep with accurat timing.
>>> I use 2.6.21 with rt-prempt patch.
>>> with enabled rt_preempt, dyn_ticks, and local_apic
>>> But
>>>
>>> req.tv_nsec = 300000;
>>> req.tv_sec = 0;
>>> nanosleep(&req,NULL)
>>>
>>> make pause around 310-330 microseconds.
>>>
>> How do you measure this?
>> If you want to have something done every 300 microseconds, you must not
>> sleep for 300 microseconds in each iteration, because you'd accumulate
>> errors. Use a periodic timer or use the current time to compute how long
>> to sleep in each iteration. Take a look how cyclictest does it.
>>
>
> no. I just want my programm go to sleep sometimes and wake up in correct time.
>
What does your program do that it has such a strict requirement on the
exact length of sleeping?
>>> I tried to understend how work nanosleep(), but it not depends from
>>> jiffies and from smp_apic_timer_interrupt.
>>>
>>> When can accuracy be lost?
>>> And how are process waked up?
>>>
>>>
>>> GolovaSteek
>>>
>> Don't forget the process will always have non-zero wakeup latency. It
>> takes some time to process an interrupt, wakeup the process and schedule
>> it to run on the CPU. 10-30 microseconds is not unreasonable.
>>
>
> But 20000 operations can be done in 10 microseconds?
> and why is there that inconstancy? Why sametimes 10 and sometimes 30?
> In which points of implementation it happens?
>
> GolovaSteek
>
If a jitter of 20 microseconds is unacceptable for your application,
don't use PC hardware. Consider using a microcontroller.
Michal
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-16 22:52 nanosleep() accuracy GolovaSteek
2007-08-17 7:00 ` Michal Schmidt
2007-08-17 7:44 ` GolovaSteek
2007-08-17 7:54 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-08-17 11:08 ` Michal Schmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C581A0.7090000@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
--to=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
--cc=golovasteek@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.