From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@us.ibm.com>,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Isolate some explicit usage of task->tgid
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 18:54:35 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C5B6AB.6070201@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070817144813.GA347@tv-sign.ru>
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/17, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> Actually the p->tgid == pid has to be changed to has_group_leader_pid(),
>> but Oleg pointed out that this is the same and thread_group_leader()
>> is more preferable.
>
> No, no, sorry for confusion! I was not clear. I meant that thread_group_leader()
> is imho better for posix timers, but
Oh! Sorry, new patch is included:
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
With pid namespaces this field is now dangerous to use explicitly, so
hide it behind the helpers.
Also the pid and pgrp fields o task_struct and signal_struct are to be
deprecated. Unfortunately this patch cannot be sent right now as this
leads to tons of warnings, so start isolating them, and deprecate later.
Actually the p->tgid == pid has to be changed to has_group_leader_pid(),
but Oleg pointed out that in case of posix cpu timers this is the same,
and thread_group_leader() is more preferable.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
---
fs/exec.c | 4 ++--
fs/proc/base.c | 2 +-
include/linux/sched.h | 6 ++++++
kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c | 12 ++++++------
kernel/posix-timers.c | 4 ++--
kernel/ptrace.c | 2 +-
kernel/signal.c | 2 +-
mm/oom_kill.c | 2 +-
8 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index f8cebf8..24b669d 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1691,6 +1691,12 @@ static inline int has_group_leader_pid(s
return p->pid == p->tgid;
}
+static inline
+int same_thread_group(struct task_struct *p1, struct task_struct *p2)
+{
+ return p1->tgid == p2->tgid;
+}
+
static inline struct task_struct *next_thread(const struct task_struct *p)
{
return list_entry(rcu_dereference(p->thread_group.next),
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 35013f2..796453b 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -865,8 +865,8 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct
write_lock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
- BUG_ON(leader->tgid != tsk->tgid);
- BUG_ON(tsk->pid == tsk->tgid);
+ BUG_ON(!same_thread_group(leader, tsk));
+ BUG_ON(has_group_leader_pid(tsk));
/*
* An exec() starts a new thread group with the
* TGID of the previous thread group. Rehash the
diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index e3009ab..6dce57c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -2474,7 +2474,7 @@ static struct dentry *proc_task_lookup(s
rcu_read_unlock();
if (!task)
goto out;
- if (leader->tgid != task->tgid)
+ if (!same_thread_group(leader, task))
goto out_drop_task;
result = proc_task_instantiate(dir, dentry, task, NULL);
diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
index b53c8fc..68c9637 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -21,8 +21,8 @@ static int check_clock(const clockid_t w
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
p = find_task_by_pid(pid);
- if (!p || (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(which_clock) ?
- p->tgid != current->tgid : p->tgid != pid)) {
+ if (!p || !(CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(which_clock) ?
+ same_thread_group(p, current) : thread_group_leader(p))) {
error = -EINVAL;
}
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -308,13 +308,13 @@ int posix_cpu_clock_get(const clockid_t
p = find_task_by_pid(pid);
if (p) {
if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(which_clock)) {
- if (p->tgid == current->tgid) {
+ if (same_thread_group(p, current)) {
error = cpu_clock_sample(which_clock,
p, &rtn);
}
} else {
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
- if (p->tgid == pid && p->signal) {
+ if (thread_group_leader(p) && p->signal) {
error =
cpu_clock_sample_group(which_clock,
p, &rtn);
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itim
p = current;
} else {
p = find_task_by_pid(pid);
- if (p && p->tgid != current->tgid)
+ if (p && !same_thread_group(p, current))
p = NULL;
}
} else {
@@ -363,7 +363,7 @@ int posix_cpu_timer_create(struct k_itim
p = current->group_leader;
} else {
p = find_task_by_pid(pid);
- if (p && p->tgid != pid)
+ if (p && !thread_group_leader(p))
p = NULL;
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/posix-timers.c b/kernel/posix-timers.c
index 8d2cb05..bc77ba8 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-timers.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static struct task_struct * good_sigeven
if ((event->sigev_notify & SIGEV_THREAD_ID ) &&
(!(rtn = find_task_by_pid(event->sigev_notify_thread_id)) ||
- rtn->tgid != current->tgid ||
+ !same_thread_group(rtn, current) ||
(event->sigev_notify & ~SIGEV_THREAD_ID) != SIGEV_SIGNAL))
return NULL;
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@ static struct k_itimer * lock_timer(time
spin_unlock(&idr_lock);
if ((timr->it_id != timer_id) || !(timr->it_process) ||
- timr->it_process->tgid != current->tgid) {
+ !same_thread_group(timr->it_process, current)) {
unlock_timer(timr, *flags);
timr = NULL;
}
diff --git a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
index 0d7fd07..f90207a 100644
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ int ptrace_attach(struct task_struct *ta
retval = -EPERM;
if (task->pid <= 1)
goto out;
- if (task->tgid == current->tgid)
+ if (same_thread_group(task, current))
goto out;
repeat:
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d6ca591..df785a7 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ static int kill_something_info(int sig,
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
for_each_process(p) {
- if (p->pid > 1 && p->tgid != current->tgid) {
+ if (p->pid > 1 && !same_thread_group(p, current)) {
int err = group_send_sig_info(sig, info, p);
++count;
if (err != -EPERM)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index e276a3c..1a2f687 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ static int oom_kill_task(struct task_str
* to memory reserves though, otherwise we might deplete all memory.
*/
do_each_thread(g, q) {
- if (q->mm == mm && q->tgid != p->tgid)
+ if (q->mm == mm && !same_thread_group(q, p))
force_sig(SIGKILL, q);
} while_each_thread(g, q);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-17 14:15 [PATCH] Isolate some explicit usage of task->tgid Pavel Emelyanov
2007-08-17 14:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-08-17 14:54 ` Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C5B6AB.6070201@openvz.org \
--to=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=sukadev@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.