All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	albertl@mail.com, jeff@garzik.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] pata_pdc2027x: PLL detection fixes
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 20:13:46 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C86C3A.7000404@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200708182058.l7IKwrcJ016820@harpo.it.uu.se>

Mikael Pettersson wrote:

> Previously I reported that the pata_pdc2027x PLL detection changes
> in kernel 2.6.22 broke the driver on my PowerMac:

>>pata_pdc2027x: Invalid PLL input clock 1691742kHz, give up!

> This is followed by a number of errors and speed reduction
> steps on the affected ports.

> There are two bugs in pata_pdc2027x's PLL detection code:

> 1. The PLL counter's start value is read before the chip is
>    put in "test mode". Outside of test mode the counter is
>    halted, and on the PowerMac the counter is zero because
>    the chip hasn't been initialised by its BIOS.

    So what?

>    The fix is to move the read of the start value to after
>    test mode is started, but before the mdelay() in test mode.

    This is not an issue, so no fix is needed.

>    This also improves the precision of the PLL detection.

    BTW, looks like we don't even need to bother reading the darn counter 
beforehand: bit 1 of the indexed register 1 (the same used to enter/exit test 
mode by twiddling its bit 6) when being cleared should reset the counter to 0 
-- I'm looking at the internal sources which were written based on the 
*fragment* of the PDC20270 datasheet (yeah, Promise didn't even give us the 
whole datasheet!) about the PLL calibration.

> 2. The code to compute the number of PLL decrements during the
>    mdelay() in test mode fails to consider that the PLL counter
>    only is 30 bits wide. If there is a wraparound, it will compute
>    an incorrect and much too large value. On the PowerMac, the
>    start count is zero, the end count is a large 30-bit value, so
>    wraparound occurs and an out of bounds PLL clock is detected.

>    The fix is to mask the (start - end) computation to 30 bits.

    Yeah, that's what I've done for the old IDE driver...

> While debugging this I also noticed that pdc_read_counter()
> reads the two halves of the 30-bit PLL counter as 16-bit values,
> and then combines them as if the halves only are 15 bits wide.
> To avoid confusion, the halves should be read as 15-bit values.

    Shouldn't matter, the bit is most probably reseved and so always remains 0.
Actually, those 2 counters count the data bytes transferred over PCI bus when 
the chip in not in the test mode.

> This patch implements all three changes. It fixes the PLL detection
> failure on my PowerMac, and doesn't cause any regressions on an x86
> with an identical card.

> Signed-off-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>

Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

> diff -rupN linux-2.6.23-rc3/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c linux-2.6.23-rc3.pata_pdc2027x-pll-detection-fixes/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c	2007-07-09 22:01:31.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc3.pata_pdc2027x-pll-detection-fixes/drivers/ata/pata_pdc2027x.c	2007-08-18 21:53:40.000000000 +0200
[...]
> @@ -719,7 +719,7 @@ static long pdc_detect_pll_input_clock(s
>  	usec_elapsed = (end_time.tv_sec - start_time.tv_sec) * 1000000 +
>  		(end_time.tv_usec - start_time.tv_usec);
>  
> -	pll_clock = (start_count - end_count) / 100 *
> +	pll_clock = ((start_count - end_count) & 0x3fffffff) / 100 *
>  		(100000000 / usec_elapsed);
>  
>  	PDPRINTK("start[%ld] end[%ld] \n", start_count, end_count);

    Only this fragment really matters.

MBR, Sergei

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-19 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-18 20:58 [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] pata_pdc2027x: PLL detection fixes Mikael Pettersson
2007-08-18 21:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19  0:14   ` Albert Lee
2007-08-19  0:53     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19  1:03       ` Albert Lee
2007-08-20  8:56       ` [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] libata: pata_pdc2027x PLL detection minor cleanup Albert Lee
2007-08-31  9:35         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19  0:01 ` [PATCH 2.6.23-rc3] pata_pdc2027x: PLL detection fixes Albert Lee
2007-08-19 16:13 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2007-08-23  9:32 ` Jeff Garzik
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-19 17:17 Mikael Pettersson
2007-08-19 17:51 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-19 19:47   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-24 16:29     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-21 10:30   ` Albert Lee
2007-08-24 16:24     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2007-08-24 18:31       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2007-08-24 18:44         ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46C86C3A.7000404@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=albertl@mail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikpe@it.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.