Re: How to do a reverse rebase?

[Johannes Sixt <J.Sixt@eudaptics.com>]

linux@horizon.com wrote:
> I don't want to rebase HEAD on *that*, but rather rebase *that*
> on top of the current HEAD.
> 
> Sometimes I have a little debug hack on a branch by itself, and I
> discover that I need it again, so I want to rebase it on top of
> current development.
> 
> But there's been a LOT of development in the meantime.  And if I do
> 
> git-rebase HEAD debug_hack
> 
> git first checks out debug_hack.  This takes a while and, more
> importantly, every file modified in HEAD...debug_hack has its timestamp
> touched and make(1) insists on recompiling it.

Heh. For the same reason I also want 'git merge --into that'.

I often hack on a topic branch until it has the right shape. One of the
changes touches a central file that triggers a complete recompile.

Now I want to merge the topic into master (which did not change this
central file since the merge-base). Currently, I must checkout master,
which touches the file, but if there existed 'merge --into' it could get
away without touching the file.

-- Hannes